curius
I imagine it is all to do with how many times it is flagged by people. If you notice a photo that does not comply with the guidlines, flag it!
Of course, there are those on here that don't mind if the rules are not followed if it gives them a bit of titilation.
The "face" rule applies to both. But some members may be more tolerant of pictures than others, and given the low number of women on the site, they may have decided to give them a break. It shouldn't happen, but human nature is what it is.
Generally, if you see anyone breaking the rules, they should be flagged. But I'll admit it's harder to flag agoodfriend than a total stranger.
The rule regarding this when posting photo's is as follows:
6. If you choose not to show your face then you may not show your genitals.
It is much easier for a woman to post a "faceless" pic because their genitalia is not as exposed and mainly internal where as a man's genitalia is external. That does not excuse all the women here breaking every other photo posting rule, i.e. no crotch shots or pornographic shots, no spread eagle or butt shots.
It is also a matter of flagging the inappropriate pics and how many flags it receives before it's removed and at the descretion of site admin.
Before flagging someones profile for inappropriate pics we general look at all the photos posted. If there is one questionable or borderline photo amongst many appropriate photos, we try to give the member the benefit of the doubt and send them a message letting them know they are violating the posting rules with that particular picture before flagging them.
Gerry, you are right, it does seem more difficult to flag a "friends" profile. We deal with it the same as above. Send them a politemessage.Over the 20 months that we've been on here, we've had two pics out of over300 that we voluntarily removed (even though we found nothing wrong with them and they were within posting guidelines) because someone on our friends list sent us a polite message. LOL, we've also pissed off a few "friends" for suggestingthey remove pics of erections, etc. In the end it was a relief to find out their true colors and get them off our friends list!
Jen (and Steve)
So:
a) No face? Then, no genitals either.
b) Erection? Undue emphasis on crotch area? "Handling" of crotch area in what appears to be a sexual way? NOT appropriate.
c) Can the photo be cropped at the waist level to remove the genitals? Then, why not do it? Unless there is something in the picture that gets lost when the genitals aren't there, it shouldn't be such a big deal.
Speaking of women and possible double standards... https://www.truenudists.com/profiles/photos.php?id=28410 Does she appear to be doing what I think she is doing?
Unless she had a sudden itch, I'd say she is doing what you think she is doing. Looks like a flaggable offense.
Mike
i posted a pic just the other day of me at the beach laying out. the picture was taken of my lower half (ie waist and legs) and the beach/water... i thought it was a beautiful picture obviously showing me enjoying the nudist lifestyle, but it was deleted in the matter of a few hours :( i'm a little disappointed about it.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!