inappropriate photos
I just took a browse thru this groups photo's it was good to see photos of members out tending their garden nude. Something I love to do it too but alas no garden here to do that.
However I was offended enough to post this after seeing the spreadeagled sexualized photos of wally69. I feel hHis photos should not be displayed in the topics gallery as they detract from the beauty of gardening naked.
The offending photos are not about nude gardening, they are cheap sexualizing of nudism I would be happy to see them be removed along with other distasteful sexualized photos.
Seems NoTanLines, the group Mod/Admin, approved those pictures of
Wally69. You're right, Wally69's pictures have NOTHING to do
with Nude Gardeners and should be removed but ... if the Mod/Admin
approved them, I guess that's the kind of pictures he wants to have
in his group.
What say you Nude Gardeners Mod/Admin ... NoTanLines?
The offending photos are not about nude gardening, they are cheap sexualizing of nudism I would be happy to see them be removed along with other distasteful sexualized photos.
I agree with you. While I do not necessarily think genitals in a photo are out of line, those where the subject positions him/herself to make sure that no one misses "anything" are a bit over the top. Running across those kind of photos make me think twice regarding whether to even visit the site.
The group Admin/Mod logged on 50 mins ago. It would seem that he
would have seen this thread and discussion on his page of posts and
topics, especially a post in a group he moderates. I hope it's just
an oversight that he missed it and will address these photos.
;-)
Actually what should be done is for Wally69 to delete them himself but ... with pictures taken like that and his need to post them ... I'm sure we all know where his mind is with relation to nudism/naturism.
The group Admin/Mod logged on 50 mins ago. It would seem that hewould have seen this thread and discussion on his page of posts andtopics, especially a post in a group he moderates. I hope it's justan oversight that he missed it and will address these photos.;-)Actually what should be done is for Wally69 to delete them himself but ... with pictures taken like that and his need to post them ... I'm sure we all know where his mind is with relation to nudism/naturism.
Yes, it was an oversight on my part that those pictures got through somehow. There are quite a few pictures that I don't approve and most of the PM's I get revolve around wondering why I have not allowed their pictures.
I believe that the offending photos have been removed, but it anyone ever has issues with this group, please PM me.
I was offended enough to post this after seeing thespreadeagled sexualized photos of wally69. I feel hHis photosshould not be displayed in the topics gallery as they detract fromthe beauty of gardening naked.
This was the original complaint by Ausmanvic.
Having looked through all 157 group photos I'm impressed.
Nearly all feature nude gardening. As I recall the two offending
photos showed Wally apparantlysitting indoors and not
even holding a seed catalogue. They were rightly removed. But to
refer to them as sexualized could have been overstating the
point. Many men (and women) sit with knees apart for comfort and
most of us face the camera for a photo, just as Wally did. Do we
have to pose differently when naked? Are we ashamed of certain body
parts?
I'm pleased to see the answer is NO. As many as 104 (two thirds) of
the photos show genitals. Most gardeners are standing butI
did spot 9 photos withthe samepose (1 sitting on a
wheel barrow, 4 on garden chair/sun-lounger and 4 on a planter).
Theseare within the gardening theme.
My compliments to NoTanLines, our moderator, for assembling such a
good portfolio. In his defencea groupmod is only
presented with tiny icons when approving or rejecting new photos.
Ne detail can be seen and it can be necessary to approve the photo
to see it fully. Only the mod can delete
photos. My only qualm is that there are a handful of photos which
have nothing to do with Nude Gardening, including some
impressive blooms which could have been grown by someone wearing
clothes. Come to think of it those blooms are displaying their
sexual organs (lol)
I look forward to seeing your gardening photo, Ausmanvic.
All good points. I do only get to see the tiniest thumbnail of the pic before I approve it. Most times I go back and look at the full size picture to make sure it's OK.
Now that we are talking about pictures, I would encourage you all to post some great nude gardening photos!
I just took a browse thru this groups photo's it was good to see photos of members out tending their garden nude. Something I love to do it too but alas no garden here to do that.However I was offended enough to post this after seeing the spreadeagled sexualized photos of wally69. I feel hHis photos should not be displayed in the topics gallery as they detract from the beauty of gardening naked.The offending photos are not about nude gardening, they are cheap sexualizing of nudism I would be happy to see them be removed along with other distasteful sexualized photos.
I Seen Wally69 Picture... Looks Out Of Place Anywhere!
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!