Sexy tops
In the relation sexiness-nudity, I believe that less is often more. Hence the creation of this group about elegance and nudity.
Let's take Cap d'Agde as an example. These women whom you see naked the whole day turn into deities of sexiness in the evening, when they cover a bit -but not too much- of their body. Also, in my daily routine of going to buy croissants and coffee in the morning and fresh fruit from the market (either in the morning or in the afternoon), sometimes I would be naked (especially in the morning), sometimes I would throw something negligently on my shoulders. It could be some dress which I don't bother to close, it could be something see-through, it could be some t-shirt... Anyway, something which covers me a bit but not entirely - this is a nudist resort after all, I don't want to look too out of place.
Now, when I am naked guys look for more than the polite two seconds but then they've seen it all, they are satisfied and leave me alone. Ok, they will try to get a better angle if I need to bend over for something on a lower shelf, but this is all. But when I am wearing a little something, I always have guys following me pretending to need articles from exactly the same aisles.
You could discard this example, saying that Cap is different, a sexy place where men are not very worried about the two-second rule. But it's even more obvious in a textile setting. As I already said, I normally don't wear any underwear in summer and definitely not when on holidays. When it's hot and I only wear say a t-shirt, this is quite easy to notice, big boobs move and attract their share of attention. I guess that men, as former hunters, are attracted by everything which moves, breasts included.
But this topic is about sexy tops. I have three types, low cut, side boob and underboob view. Which ones are nicer, sexier, more attractive?
I confess that I have a preference for deep necklines. Many of my evening dresses, blouses and jackets have very low necklines. Some go well under my belly button and most go also very low in the back. Of course, they are not the most comfortable outfits, you need to move carefully, keep your back straight, don't bend etc. But just as high heels are less than comfy but make you walk straight and elegantly, very low-cut tops oblige you to hold an elegant position when you are seated. Which is nice in the evening, when ladies try to look their best.
Now low necklines attract their fair share of attention, but in particular from other ladies. I also like to look at other women when they wear their sexiest evening dress and I am looked at as well. And no, there is (usually) no hard feelings, no competition or jealousy, just smiles between us. Ok, waiters also seem to like them. I wonder why basically all waiters are male in restaurants where you can wear fancy evening dresses. At least in France. I can't but smile seeing how, when they serve the meals or drinks, they place themselves in the best position to see a bit more down my dress. I don't normally give them satisfaction, I wear my back straight and the shoulders pulled back - except sometimes when they are extra nice (they usually are, I get excellent service when I wear a sexy evening dress), in which case I may relax and bend a bit in a more casual stance, letting them see "them" as a bonus (we tip very little in France).
But I have the feeling that side openings attract even more attention - except that this time from men, not from women. I'm not speaking here about evening dresses (many do have some side view, of course) but about regular sleeveless shirts with little bit bigger openings for arms. They are extremely comfy in summer, they don't make you sweat, I like them a lot and I own several, but I try not to wear them except when it's really-really hot and I need to spend a significant amount of time outdoors. And that's because whenever I'm in a static public setting - in a tramway, in a bus station, in a shop, in a restaurant... You name it- and I look around I see at least one guy placed at 45 degrees behind me, trying to see a bit more skin. Now, I became very comfortable with my nudity and I don't mind if they see a bit more than the creator of the shirt intended to show, but this can be a bit disruptive.
But the worst (which likely means the sexiest) are shirts with an underboob view. Again, for guys, not for girls. I don't even wear them except in two situations. The first one is when I'm on holidays near the sea, usually just to go to the beach and back, sometimes for a quick lunch in a place where beachwear is allowed. Still, they attract a lot of attention.
The other situation is when I leave the gym. I normally wear them at the gym, but over a sports bra, with yoga pants or a tight short. When I've finished, I'd take a quick shower and discard the bra. The blouses, which are simple crop tops when I wear a bra, become underboob ones when the breasts are released and hang lower. I don't take my bra off to provoke you guys but trust me, wearing a sports bra in the summer heat makes me sweat and uncomfortable. You can't see more than an inch or so, definitely not the nipple, but that modest inch really seems to fascinate guys. I get lots of looks on my way to my car or on my bike (I usually bike, yes, an old knackered Peugeot ladies' bike like you see in films about France). But the worst is when I'm driving, because I do this mainly when I need to make a quick stop by a supermarket to buy some groceries. I always -always- have at least one guy, often 2 or 3, who seem to have exactly the same need for groceries as me and follow me everywhere. They don't try to approach me, or at least not usually, they just look, trying to not make it very obvious. I even feel guilty for their wasted time and sometimes feel obliged to reach for something on the top shelf, read the label then put it back - just to let them see "them" so they get some satisfaction for all the time they spent following me.
So guys - when I wear an elegant evening dress I do it to feel attractive, so attention is appreciated. But t-shirts, be them open on the side or too short to cover everything- are normally worn just for comfort.
But all this long intro just to ask the question I started with: What do you consider sexier, what attracts your eyes most, low necklines, side boobs or underboobs?
In the relation sexiness-nudity, I believe that less is often more. Hence the creation of this group about elegance and nudity.Let's take Cap d'Agde as an example. These women whom you see naked the whole day turn into deities of sexiness in the evening, when they cover a bit -but not too much- of their body. Also, in my daily routine of going to buy croissants and coffee in the morning and fresh fruit from the market (either in the morning or in the afternoon), sometimes I would be naked (especially in the morning), sometimes I would throw something negligently on my shoulders. It could be some dress which I don't bother to close, it could be something see-through, it could be some t-shirt... Anyway, something which covers me a bit but not entirely - this is a nudist resort after all, I don't want to look too out of place.Now, when I am naked guys look for more than the polite two seconds but then they've seen it all, they are satisfied and leave me alone. Ok, they will try to get a better angle if I need to bend over for something on a lower shelf, but this is all. But when I am wearing a little something, I always have guys following me pretending to need articles from exactly the same aisles.You could discard this example, saying that Cap is different, a sexy place where men are not very worried about the two-second rule. But it's even more obvious in a textile setting. As I already said, I normally don't wear any underwear in summer and definitely not when on holidays. When it's hot and I only wear say a t-shirt, this is quite easy to notice, big boobs move and attract their share of attention. I guess that men, as former hunters, are attracted by everything which moves, breasts included.But this topic is about sexy tops. I have three types, low cut, side boob and underboob view. Which ones are nicer, sexier, more attractive?I confess that I have a preference for deep necklines. Many of my evening dresses, blouses and jackets have very low necklines. Some go well under my belly button and most go also very low in the back. Of course, they are not the most comfortable outfits, you need to move carefully, keep your back straight, don't bend etc. But just as high heels are less than comfy but make you walk straight and elegantly, very low-cut tops oblige you to hold an elegant position when you are seated. Which is nice in the evening, when ladies try to look their best.Now low necklines attract their fair share of attention, but in particular from other ladies. I also like to look at other women when they wear their sexiest evening dress and I am looked at as well. And no, there is (usually) no hard feelings, no competition or jealousy, just smiles between us. Ok, waiters also seem to like them. I wonder why basically all waiters are male in restaurants where you can wear fancy evening dresses. At least in France. I can't but smile seeing how, when they serve the meals or drinks, they place themselves in the best position to see a bit more down my dress. I don't normally give them satisfaction, I wear my back straight and the shoulders pulled back - except sometimes when they are extra nice (they usually are, I get excellent service when I wear a sexy evening dress), in which case I may relax and bend a bit in a more casual stance, letting them see "them" as a bonus (we tip very little in France).But I have the feeling that side openings attract even more attention - except that this time from men, not from women. I'm not speaking here about evening dresses (many do have some side view, of course) but about regular sleeveless shirts with little bit bigger openings for arms. They are extremely comfy in summer, they don't make you sweat, I like them a lot and I own several, but I try not to wear them except when it's really-really hot and I need to spend a significant amount of time outdoors. And that's because whenever I'm in a static public setting - in a tramway, in a bus station, in a shop, in a restaurant... You name it- and I look around I see at least one guy placed at 45 degrees behind me, trying to see a bit more skin. Now, I became very comfortable with my nudity and I don't mind if they see a bit more than the creator of the shirt intended to show, but this can be a bit disruptive.But the worst (which likely means the sexiest) are shirts with an underboob view. Again, for guys, not for girls. I don't even wear them except in two situations. The first one is when I'm on holidays near the sea, usually just to go to the beach and back, sometimes for a quick lunch in a place where beachwear is allowed. Still, they attract a lot of attention.The other situation is when I leave the gym. I normally wear them at the gym, but over a sports bra, with yoga pants or a tight short. When I've finished, I'd take a quick shower and discard the bra. The blouses, which are simple crop tops when I wear a bra, become underboob ones when the breasts are released and hang lower. I don't take my bra off to provoke you guys but trust me, wearing a sports bra in the summer heat makes me sweat and uncomfortable. You can't see more than an inch or so, definitely not the nipple, but that modest inch really seems to fascinate guys. I get lots of looks on my way to my car or on my bike (I usually bike, yes, an old knackered Peugeot ladies' bike like you see in films about France). But the worst is when I'm driving, because I do this mainly when I need to make a quick stop by a supermarket to buy some groceries. I always -always- have at least one guy, often 2 or 3, who seem to have exactly the same need for groceries as me and follow me everywhere. They don't try to approach me, or at least not usually, they just look, trying to not make it very obvious. I even feel guilty for their wasted time and sometimes feel obliged to reach for something on the top shelf, read the label then put it back - just to let them see "them" so they get some satisfaction for all the time they spent following me.So guys - when I wear an elegant evening dress I do it to feel attractive, so attention is appreciated. But t-shirts, be them open on the side or too short to cover everything- are normally worn just for comfort.But all this long intro just to ask the question I started with: What do you consider sexier, what attracts your eyes most, low necklines, side boobs or underboobs?
Depends on the situation, the very very low cut outfit where you see belly button or lower is extremely sexy, almost formally sexy I guess, casually sexy has to be the side boob view, I so love that view. Under-boob, a little less classy or elegant in my very very humble opinion! And looks a bit false, almost too much on purpose, where side view is casual, accidental, natural.
Richie x
I, too, enjoy the view of a low cut dress. The vantage of seeing all that cleavage is a nice addition to an attractive lady. I'm guilty as I confess to being a 'breast' man. But, back to the point, low cut dresses afford a quick glance without being tacky. The side boob is nice but not the same as the low cut and the bottom view requires 'non-gentlemanly' effort. I'll stick with the low cut and tasteful, quick glances.
All are definitely nice (and if some of your dresses are low enough that there may even be a little 'decollete' at the rear - wow!) but I guess the classiness does vary.
The plunging evening gown is definitely classy, and the veiwer is under no illusions that it's how you want to look. I must admit I'm surprised a waiter may try for a better view as I'm sure all other angles are equally pleasing, but then I've never waited on tables. Or perhaps they're researching as to whether you've opted for the small security of double-sided tape...
The open sleeve, as you present the situation, is definitely more casual and not obviously deliberate in the same way. The attentive make mind, however, may be alert to the opportunity. I'd hate to think I'd deviate my path so much as to possibly Carrasco a glimpse, but great I'd be caught out should you ever be able to review a video of my life. I guess it's also the chance of that glance that's not necessarily expected by the subject, in contrast to the low evening gown. Depending on your movements, a chance to see via the neckline, even if a different angle, is in the same broad category.
(Of course, a side view may be possible with various evening gowns, but that's more a variation of the first scenario rather than the second.)
The underboob variation, to me, is different again as I cannot imagine anyone wearing it without knowing its 'risks' and how it shall be interpreted by others in that context. Definitely less classy than an evening gown but also than the loose top for it's message, I think, even if I struggle to say why such degrees of exposure is classy one way and not the other. Hmmm.... Not to say my eye won't catch the presence of such a garment in my vicinity or the person wearing it.
My other thought (accidentally pressed save too soon) are the implications of when there's nothing underneath. Expected for the evening gown (and I'm reminded of once when I read Victoria Beckham believed that if a dress required such foundation garments it wasn't made properly), but perhaps less so for the others.
Going braless is so much rarer here than when I was young that when I notice it I fear my reaction to such a pleasant sight might be noticed by the subject in such a way that she is discouraged. Perhaps I wouldn't change her mind, perhaps she's comfortable with her choice, perhaps I'm the 500th (or 5000th) such reaction she's seen that day. Would that fact make me more interested? Yes, but I feel I wouldn't be uninterested otherwise, and hopefully the difference wouldn't make me behave differently. But I may be kidding myself, especially should I even happen to encounter you in a supermarket in such a crop top contemplating the cheeses on the upper shelf.
My eyes are always attracted to a backless style dress. It immediately lets one know there is no bra; most have very minimal side coverage. The front is open sheer fabric. Just sheer enough to be able to see the silhouette of your bits. Mid-thigh in length with side splits, so when you walk or dance, it will be known there is only you underneath. I love seeing the back of a beautiful lady in a dress like this; it tells the story of her life!
A dress that makes one wonder how she keeps it in place, and during the throws of dancing, well.....
Short tops with under-boobs have their place, walking or jogging on the beach, walking out to the pool, or perhaps in the gym, but not for sexy evening wear or public transportation.
The crop tops are fun ! At least they look like they are fun with the idea of showing off but by chance. Are they sexy oh yes, we have seen the videos. But for evening wear no they dont have the same affect.
As for the plunging neck line. Yes those are the most common outfits. Exposing more skin to views from us that enjoy. Evening outfit is more appropriate. Yes it makes you hold your shoulders back. Which is something that young girls should remember to do anyway for their back. Many of the fabrics are made to hang correctly to protect from the unexpected exposure. Lol
As for the side with large opening. Those are the best for every day use. More relaxed, but still very sexy. And if you want to expose more its very easy to just pull it to the side. Theres more of a motion affect with this type. I would think that the movement would cause you breasts to be showing an erect nipples. The fabric is naturally going to tease the nipples. As for an evening dress, yes but its got to be special. Maybe a fabric with some kind of an accent, color or even a trimmed different. But remember that the people who are looking are on your side instead of in front of you to see the beauty of someone. Plus the side can come way lower in the back to expose some of the top of the cheeks. The contrast is really spectacular.
Oh I remember something ! Backless outfits you can wear jewelry on your back ! You know from your neck to a waist belt or even farther to your hips.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!