Hairy - part 2.
As the first topic got to the second page, here is a new one. And if it also raises interest, tomorrow we'll open that can of worms: how do we like our men, bald or hairy and how do they like themselves.
First, the question in the previous topic was not really about what you guys like but rather why. As stated from the beginning, I believe that 99% of you like it smooth and this is why 99% of us shave or wax it.
As said, I believe this is because guys always want younger and more. Yes, a shaved pussy signals youth and it does usually look younger than when completely hidden by a generous jungle. And we live in a world where youth is king and most guys around here are middle aged and basically lose it when they see a young sexy naked girl.
Plus, a bush hides much of the goodies so you want it out of the way. Then you want us to be open legged to see inside then... Well, I guess if we could strip our skin off or turn our vagina inside out like a glove you would all want to see it. Always more.
And no, shaving is not high maintenance. Our bush doesn't grow as furiously fast as your beard. At least, this is my experience as the owner of a very sparse and modest bush - 20 seconds twice a week under the shower will make sure there are never any stubbles. The really high maintenance process is waxing - you have to wait for weeks for it to grow long enough and then go through a very painful process. I think people (mostly men) prefer waxing (for them or for women) because it is such an intimate process that it makes them phantasm. I think that if I offered 100 men the opportunity to wax me 80 of them would gladly look at an online tutorial and give me a hand. If I offered to wax them myself, 70 of them would accept.
Now an interesting question which arose is why there are so few blonde and red bushes. I'm not sure about redheads, I think many of them actually do have red bushes but it is true that a majority of blondes have dark ones so blonde bushes like mine are quite rare (I uploaded a pic, but it will likely stay on for a short time only).
I believe that beyond their primary functions of protecting and keeping pheromones persistent, bushes also had a signaling function. Or rather two. At the beginning, they were signaling sexual maturity and were supposed to be very appealing to men. Then, women started to cover their bottom part precisely to not attract too many men and when they didn't do it that triangle was signaling "I'm naked so maybe available" and was supposed to make you guys want more. So a red bush can still accomplish that task, but a blonde one on light skin is quite ineffective in this respect: if you see me naked you need to squint or be less than say 15 m away to notice that I am wearing one. So yes, girls with dark bushes saw more action and left more descendants.
I am of course aware that this reasoning doesn't work well for black girls - they should have blonde bushes in such case, but I suspect you can't ask for perfection from evolution or maybe protecting that patch of hair from melanin was either not as interesting or too resource-intensive.
So yes, the Bermuda triangle used to be very attractive and I suspect that 100 years ago no girl wished to shed it. Then bikini came and girls with generous endowment in the hair department had to shave some. Bikini bottoms became narrower and narrower so more and more girls had to buy shavers. Then likely working girls and Penthouse magazines started to feature what we call in France "metro tickets" (tiny rectangular patches), then even narrower landing strips then... Nothing. And guys began to like that more and more for the above-proposed reasons.
So now my (very modest, barely visible) blonde bush attracts so much attention because of the scarcity of the view: it's rare to see a woman wearing one these days and it's almost impossible to see one with a blonde bush.
I got rid of it, I don't need the extra attention and it is clearly too scarce to be modelled into any meaningful shape. As for the extra attention I have news for you. I think I attract far more when dressed than when naked. Don't get me wrong, I think I do have a nice body and I'm happy with it and all men look at it and it always makes an impression on them, but I can tell how much of it I make by a very simple test: I address a guy a question or I just say Hello and I count silently the number of seconds it takes him to swallow his saliva and answer.
And on average if I'm nude it's 2 to 3 seconds. If I'm dressed as a cheerleader it's 3 to 4. And as a diva it's always over 5.
As a cheerleader means with a light and very short skirt and a crop tank top with some underboob or side boob view. If I also have my rollers it's an instant hit. As a diva means very sexily but very elegantly too, everything very tight, very low-cut neckline, naked back and either a short or very open skirt. Something classy and elegant, good quality but with very high heels and lots of makeup.
So yes, the more covered I am the more if an impression I make. I guess I should feel insulted?
Fine, I'll stop here and won't even ask my usual final questions. But remember it is not your individual preference which is the most interesting, but rather your thoughts about why you have this preference.
And maybe tomorrow a topic about men and body hair.
Quite right Flora, i failed miserably to actually answer the question as to "why" rather than just my preferences.
Hmm, its tricky and along the lines you mention, plus some practicalities too, which i may get to.
Absolutely right, that the less hair the more of the goods(?) are visible, think of a superb shop window but there's a jungle between the viewer and the displays... irritating or what.
There's youthfulness of course, but clearly the rest of the anatomy of the subject tells most of the story there, so little room for big confusion.
On to practicalities, for the lady... cleaning up after... well let's say 'a happy ending' can be a rather tricky affair, the hair can get all matted and stuck together and bothersome to clean up, easier for a shaved area, for the guy, well... it can be unpleasant to have lots of hair in your mouth or stuck between your teeth... no such issues with a nice smooth 'downstairs'.
So, some esthetics, some practicalities...
Ticking a few boxes... Richie x
It's true that there is an allure to women who are dressed in a sexy way. When nude, there is nothing to hide (obviously) and who we are is simply there to be seen. When dressed, there is the tendency to wonder what's hidden. The more that's covered, the longer we need to look to see what's there.
Regarding hair and shaving, my preference is to be shaved and for my partner to be shaved. This not because it signifies youth and that is what I want or am trying to achieve. Practically speaking, when there is no hair, there is no hair to get in the way. Hairs between my teeth are simply uncomfortable and the sensation of hair - even when trimmed short - on the tongue is unpleasant (for me).
Guys, you are rationalising here. How many times did you get a curly stuck between your teeth? Say maybe once in 40 years?
I get it. You don't like the aesthetics if it, do you think we absolutely adore your hairy bits? But ok, this is for another potential topic. And yes, if you're Jungle Jane down there you need a bit of extra effort on hygiene, but most of us ladies have a far better hygiene than you guys to begin with. Let's cut it to You. Don't. Like. Hair. Which is fair enough.
Take me for example (a way of speaking, not an offer!). I have (or rather I had until yesterday) a small patch of scarce and trimmed blondish hair on my pubis, for decoration purposes only. Everything else was balder than your palm. The chance that you get a curly in your mouth if you indulge me for a couple of hours is far less than the chance that you win the Euromillion ten times in a row. I'm ready to bet on it. Oh well, maybe not.
I didn't say "stuck" between the teeth. The sensation of hair in the mouth and teeth is not pleasing to me - nor is it to my partner and I am, therefore, also shaved smooth everywhere her mouth goes (well, not nipples and she is sometimes briefly there, too).
I am impressed by the theory but I must admit to being quite simple on the subject. I was hairy, a partner liked it that way, and a fetish website published me a few times. Then, I shaved for a shoot, and I liked it so much I stayed this way. Its comfortable and being honest, it seems to help when I masturbate. .
I hate VPL and go comando,. In the winter wolford fatal 15 is a must. But in the Summer I feel less self conscious if shaven when knicker less, wearing a short dress.
So two or three good selfish reasons and none of them for men
... and none of them for men
Ultimately, isn't this what we should do? While I have strong considerations for my partner, I need to be comfortable. If there is something that needs to get resolved (like shaved or unshaved), we talk about it and come to an agreement about how to proceed. Fortunately, she likes to be shaved and likes me shaved.
I should probably launch another topic about it.
Of course we do things for our partner. But Western (mostly US) propaganda is that we should only do things for ourselves and screw that narcissist (the whole folly of calling everyone you don't agree with a narcissist is becoming as much of a hoax as Freudian psychoanalysis - and yes, I can prove it mathematically). But we live in a world where assertiveness and self-confidence are king and queen - and the main root of violence. I'm reading Baumsteiner's book Evil; it's not well written, some parts can be debated, but it does make big points.
And no, I don't agree with the mainstream wisdom that we need to discuss about everything either. Very educated people discuss about ideas, fine. Maybe other discuss about diner, movies or holidays. Fine too. But if you don't feel what your partner likes in bed, whether he wants you hairy or shaved, whether he wants you dominatrix, seductress or slave, or whether, excuse my French, he likes his cock sucked in the morning or in the evening and you actually have to talk and negotiate all this then your empathy is shot, your relation is ailing and you're in for a lifetime of negotiations (read quarrelling) instead if one of love and enjoyment. But I do know that I am an outlier on these. Go ahead, negotiate everything, be assertive and self-confident and if you don't have it your way call your partner a narcissist and sue him.
I should probably launch another topic about it.Of course we do things for our partner. But Western (mostly US) propaganda is that we should only do things for ourselves and screw that narcissist (the whole folly of calling everyone you don't agree with a narcissist is becoming as much of a hoax as Freudian psychoanalysis - and yes, I can prove it mathematically). But we live in a world where assertiveness and self-confidence are king and queen - and the main root of violence. I'm reading Baumsteiner's book Evil; it's not well written, some parts can be debated, but it does make big points.And no, I don't agree with the mainstream wisdom that we need to discuss about everything either. Very educated people discuss about ideas, fine. Maybe other discuss about diner, movies or holidays. Fine too. But if you don't feel what your partner likes in bed, whether he wants you hairy or shaved, whether he wants you dominatrix, seductress or slave, or whether, excuse my French, he likes his cock sucked in the morning or in the evening and you actually have to talk and negotiate all this then your empathy is shot, your relation is ailing and you're in for a lifetime of negotiations (read quarrelling) instead if one of love and enjoyment. But I do know that I am an outlier on these. Go ahead, negotiate everything, be assertive and self-confident and if you don't have it your way call your partner a narcissist and sue him.
I'm not seeing the link between your post and having a (very rare, admittedly, shamefully) pube stuck in my teeth, need to re-read your post i think.
Anywho,