. But I suspect the c ringers dont really care.
The simple fact is the guy whos wearing old washing machine parts on his cock and balls will never concede is sexual.
Everyone else thinks it is.
So when all the nudist spaces are gone, itll be because of all these people in hats or with haircuts that ruined it.
Woodsman, the excuses after excuses is embarrassing, Im sorry.
.So when all the nudist spaces are gone, itll be because of all these people in hats or with haircuts that ruined it.Woodsman, the excuses after excuses is embarrassing, Im sorry.
If I'm making the same point over and over, it's because I don't think I'm properly getting my message across. I apologize for that.
And I do maintain that when we lose all those nudist spaces, it's because of people who are acting badly with sexual misconduct or making unwanted advances to other people, not people who wear jewelry that mainstream nudists frown on.
If you truly sense that the mere wearing of genital jewelry is enough to get a beach closed down by public authorities, then by all means discourage it... not because it's a betrayal of nudist beliefs or sentiments of personal freedom, but because the Powers That Be at that particular beach have dictated it. "When in Rome..." Same for resorts, who have a lot more power to boot somebody who's out of line with their philosophy.
Maybe it's time for a frank talk with the authorities, to ask them what they consider out of line. I know of one nudist beach around here (I forget the name of it offhand, but it's on the coast where Fort Ord used to be). The rangers there are happy to talk with visitors, and they appreciate that those visitors take the time to ask them about policy rather than just going ahead and doing what they want.
Mate, its nothing to do with the authority.
Its a personal choice and its a personal obligation.
If your objective is prioritising your shiny cock over everything else.
Sigh.
It was fun while it lasted.
This is a straight out false dichotomy a perfect example of whataboutism that continues to deflect from the reality. Genuine nudist beliefs are exclusive of the idea that sexual activity is a private thing and cock rings despite all the protestations are designed as a precursor to sexual activity so because, one person or one happens to go along with the idea that c rings are non sexual doesnt make it so. On earth one that just isnt reality. People in the majority of people in the nudist community and on mainstream society see it for what it is. The consequence of trying project an alternative set of facts on earth two doesnt change. This is a case of the minority who arent being harmed claiming victimhood I the face of the actual beliefs of the majority are being harmed..If you truly sense that the mere wearing of genital jewelry is enough to get a beach closed down by public authorities, then by all means discourage it... not because it's a betrayal of nudist beliefs or sentiments of personal freedom, but because the Powers That Be at that particular beach have dictated it. "When in Rome..." Same for resorts, who have a lot more power to boot somebody who's out of line with their philosophy..
StevieLorna wrote:Mate, its nothing to do with the authority.Its a personal choice and its a personal obligation.
I do agree with that, as far as personal sentiments go.
But what I'm fearing is that it has everything to do with the authority. When people say that beaches will be closed down because of X activity, it won't be because fellow beachgoers have a problem with X. It will be because the authorities have a problem with X.
"X" could be anything from simple nudity to overt sex. It won't matter.
Ok, Woodsman. How would you deal with X.
How would you convince X that what X is doing is not in keeping with promotion of nudism as a non sexual, family friendly activity where all are welcome who adhere to this philosophy.
Tell us all how you would speak to X and convince them that how the others see them is what is making it harder to keep these spaces safe for the future?
Thanks for pointing out the clear obfuscation. Why muddy the waters by introducing "x". We arent talking about X or some unknown. The OP asked about a specific situation, that we know has specific consequences. I am so perplexed as to why the individualist libertarian viewpoint being expressed cant take this argument head on. Why cant we just address the issue at hand and its clear consequences.Ok, How would you convince X that what X is doing is not in keeping with promotion of nudism as a non sexual, family friendly activity where all are welcome who adhere to this philosophy.Tell us all how you would speak to X and convince them that how the others see them is what is making it harder to keep these spaces safe for the future?
StevieLorna wrote:Ok, Woodsman. How would you deal with X.How would you convince X that what X is doing is not in keeping with promotion of nudism as a non sexual, family friendly activity where all are welcome who adhere to this philosophy.Tell us all how you would speak to X and convince them that how the others see them is what is making it harder to keep these spaces safe for the future?
I'm glad you asked that.
It would depend on the X.
If it's as simple as a cock ring, I probably wouldn't say anything about it. I certainly wouldn't compliment him on it. But I would ask him about why he was on the beach, and what he was looking for. If I thought he might be a candidate for the true nudist lifestyle, I might remark on that ring later on in the conversation, letting him know that the ring might be construed as sending out the wrong signals. If he said that those were precisely the signals he was putting out, then I'd tell him "Good luck with that. Nobody's interested in that here. If you think that this nude beach (or resort, or whatever) is a place where sex happens, you have been misinformed."
If he was engaging in any kind of sexuality -- with or without a cock ring -- from flaunting an erection or hitting up women to anything more extreme, I'd say, "Hey, dude, you're out of line here. This is a public beach, but we're being nude here only because we're telling the authorities that we're a family-oriented activity. Do you want to get us closed down for everybody? Please don't do what you're doing and ruin it all for the rest of us!"
If he complied with the request, no harm, no foul. If he persisted with the activity, I'd call the authorities and let them know what this person was doing, and that if they wanted to prosecute him, I would be totally OK with that.
That would make it clear to the authorities that we are as concerned with the public image of non-sexual nudism as they are, and that we're on their side.
I think it is silly and ridicules anyone is worried about jewelry!
Your worried about beaches being closed, I have far more worry about the insane Christian right is doing to the USA!
Look up the Project 2025, and you will not only lose a public lifestyle, but you will lose way more!
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!