I figure this is a good place to post thiseven though most sensible folks already knows that our current President sticks not one, but both feet in his mouth consistantly! I don't think Herman would make this mistake as he has "smarts" in his resume! Remember any of these? OBAMA'S OWN WORDS TRAP HIM: 2008: "Navy Seal Team 6 is Cheney's private assassination team." 2011: "I put together Seal Team 6 to take out Bin Laden." 2008: "Bin Laden is innocent until proven guilty, and must be captured alive and given a fair trial." 2011: "I authorized Seal Team 6 to kill Bin Laden." 2008: "Guantanamo is entirely unnecessary, and the detainees should not be interrogated." 2011: "Vital intelligence was obtained from Guantanamo detainees that led to our locating Bin Laden." I HOPE THIS GETS SENT AROUND TO PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH! Quote of the Day: "If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you're not a racist, you'll have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you're not an idiot."
I especially liked your Quote of the Day. Thank you
Thank you! I wish I were smart enough tocatch and come up with all these facts myself, but thank goodness, I have friends that contribute at lot!
In answer tosdnatureboy,a lot of the"fact" disproving sites (and there are several) out there do disagree with each other! I do remember statements myself although, maybe not worded as such! I do know we do not have 57 United States also!
Watch CNN at 8:00 EDT tonight 6-13-2011 for a candidates' debate. I'm always impressed at what Mr. Cain, "The Hermanator", has to say.
Well any thoughts 5 days later? BoR dismissed Herman as having no chance and the delightful Anne Coulter made the obersvation that noone with no record of public office has had much success. Is this time around any different? He hasn't demonstrated that furher tax cuts will boost investment etc. You guys already have low taxes the nature of wold cpital has changed so the old solutions are not relevant. I don't think an Independent voter will vote for Bachman, she will rally the right wing but scare everyone else.
No matter who is elected, keep in mind this one little humorous quote that has some credibility due to history:
"If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years, there would probably be a shortage of sand"!
No matter who is elected, keep in mind this one little humorous quote that has some credibility due to history:"If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years, there would probably be a shortage of sand"!
Yea the US govt and military followed that principle in Iraq, interestingly I have worked for 2 US banks and without technology improvements I doubt they would make as much money as they do. I would like to see some proud Federal govt employees show that the Fox network and tea party agenda is not mainstream and have a proud record of achievement in some fields.
No matter who is elected, keep in mind this one little humorous quote that has some credibility due to history: "If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years, there would probably be a shortage of sand"!
Yea the US govt and military followed that principle in Iraq, interestingly I have worked for 2 US banks and without technology improvements I doubt they would make as much money as they do. I would like to see some proud Federal govt employees show that the Fox network and tea party agenda is not mainstream and have a proud record of achievement in some fields.
Yes! Most of the media is not "truthful" in my opinion! It seems to me thatmost all behind some agenda or a candidate and adjust the story to their benefit! It is similar to gossip in that each person who passes the info on, adjusts it to suit them or make it "more interesting"! It is just like an English Teacher told me once, "Adverbs and adjectivescan sometimes change the whole outlook and meaning of a sentence".
I depend on Fox to somewhat relate the truth as they seem to cover somewhat both sides of an issue most of the time, but you do know where they stand!
do we need to publish a list of Fox lies? They have the worst record in the media.
According to whom????.... the other media and the present administration,I'm sure!
With all the lies and obvious interests of "the other media" I am convinced Fox takes a considerable distantback seat to them! Yes, it would be easier to publish the fewer Fox news "lies"!
From any journalistic standpoint, from any school, or any academic, Fox news would not be considered "legitimate" in any sense of the word. And if you want to construct a vast "left wing liberal conspiracy" out of that, I'm sure that you can and there is a lot of help out there.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!