Well written.It's ironic you think that a jockstrap's design is perhaps gay looking, framing the ass cheeks, and yet you like wearing thongs... underwear that goes in your crack, rubbing your man-hole with every step and motion and how "pleasing it feels"!! How "gay" is that??
I wore a jock in PE in grades 7-12 and then in college PE.
I've seen a lot of guys wearing jocks. But it never occurred to me that the straps "framed the ass." But, I guess they do. As you mention, the straps go around the sides to avoid being in the crack.
The whole idea was to demobilize the cock and balls with the least amount of material as possible. Eventually smaller jocks were developed than the original Bike No. 10 that we all wore in PE class. But, honestly, they really don't have that much less fabric than a pair of briefs.
I looked up anorak. --If I was allowed, Id post a picture of my anorak.
-- Seems that it either means a type of jacket or a type of undershirt. I'm guessing that word also has some other meaning. I would be interested to know what that other meaning is.
Its a derivative of Anoraq, an Eskimo word for waterproof hooded jacket.Its about as far away from naturism as you can get but its as relevant as a tread about underwear. My point.
And your point as well as mine have been made by the focus on asses which again has nothing to do with naturism but I suspects was the intention of reviving the post in the first place. Another indicator of how far away from naturism and nudism many of the conversations are on this site.
Conversations about nudism is certainly what this site should be about, but as they drift away from the original post, they can still be entertaining. Think of it like a Democrat watching Fox News or a Trumpian with CNN. It gives us something to yell at the screen about. I can make us feel better especially when done nude.