Photos of my balls inappropriate??
Why is it that all you guys in this group are allowed to upload pics of your jewels to this group but I am not? Some of you may have seen my balls pics over the two days that they were in the media section. In fact a couple of you even commented on the media image. It appears that because my balls hang between my thighs they are somehow offensive. I don't agree. My pics were not sexually charged, they were candidly snapped not posed and are not sexual overtly or covertly or posed and without sexual innuendo. What goes here? It's a site primarily for true nudists not a place for naked men to pick up a stray bit of sex, although I'm sure it happens just as it does at any nudist resort. So why is it that sex on display is acceptable but a candid shot of someone's balls hanging between their thighs is considered unacceptable? My only answer to this is that the moderator/administrator has a penis but no scrotum and is OK to accept pics that have a focus on a penis or vagina but not of a scrotum when the penis is out of view. I don't know, I give up.
Would have to agree with you Horhej, it's damn frustrating. I'm group Administrator, in starting "BALLS" I pictured it being a group where we guys could post and share our ball photos and exchange comments as well. It seems like the TN Administration (aka TN Police) keep deleting photos from the Group Media section as well as from Discussion Posts. What's frustrating too is that, as you point out, there doesn't appear to be any consistency in their censorship practices. We're all adults who're also nudists, I always believed the Nudist Credo which says that all parts are to be treated with equal dignity, which also goes for photos. Like you, I've also posted close--ups of my pubes, often along with a full body pic alongside so they read as a series of pics that "zoom in" on my cock, ass and face as well. Of course you can guess which ones get deleted!
Agree! Within one group I uploaded two photos. One, a full body photo of my back, with no genitalia visible. Pending approval it was located next to a photo of a females back. The other a full body with my face blocked by the freezer door of our refrigerator. There are other photos in the group with obscured faces. Multiple times after they disappeared I uploaded them again thinking there was a technical problem. There was never any communication from the censor indicating a problem with either photo. Eventually I was banned from the group.
Therefore, in order to no longer offend the delicate sensibilities of the censors, I have replaced all my profile photos with pixelated versions of the same photos. Now our censors are happy and nudism has taken a step back towards the Victorian era.
Thank you as a group Administrator for letting us know you also have difficulties with some photos. I had one Group Admin tell me I was not eligible because I had a photo in my TN profile that looked like an erection.....It was a photo of me shaving my beard at my cock was actually soft at the time of the photo. I had to remove that photo in order to be accepted by the group.
You are right, there is an inconsistence in what is allowed and what is not. Perhaps one of these days...
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!