I think it's a really cute way to try and give someone in Forums and Groups an idea of how active someone is. Users just have to realize that the rankings are for fun and can never be construed as literal.
It is kind of sad that you can regress if a thread or threads on which you were active get deleted. Maybe we get a consensus here to report that as a bug? You made the effort to post and be active, the fact that a thread goes away shouldn't diminish that fact...
I think it's a really cute way to try and give someone in Forums and Groups an idea of how active someone is. Users just have to realize that the rankings are for fun and can never be construed as literal.It is kind of sad that you can regress if a thread or threads on which you were active get deleted. Maybe we get a consensus here to report that as a bug? You made the effort to post and be active, the fact that a thread goes away shouldn't diminish that fact...
I agree totally with the first point here but as far as the second one is concerned, it's just one of those things which don't really affect anything important so it should just be left as it is.
If you have been a prolific poster on a lost topic it might affect your "status" for a few days if you were just over one of the thresholds, but that will soon correct itself.
I know that the rankings can't match reality for everyone, but they are really out of line for me.I generally shed my shirt before my footwear, so those two are reversed.Will also seem odd to be in the "underwear only" level since I don't own any.I guess in a way when I am there I will already be "butt naked", because my "Underwear" is bare skin.I find it odd that so many "nudists" wear shoes.I also do not own underwear.
I generally do not wear shoes when I am nude. I occasionally wear flip flops on hot or rough surfaces.
However, when partially dressed, I am more likely to be barefoot than shirtless.