Scrotox
This is not for me. I don't see the benefit to effort ratio being significant. $1K for a temporary change that paralyses the muscles in the sack to it hangs lower and wrinkle free. I wear a cock ring in winter to keep the boys from retreating into their cave. I sometimes wear Steel ball stretchers not to elongate my sack but because I like the tugging feeling. Both of these are relatively cheap and are long lasting.
This is the kind of thing that makes me weep for straight men. If you read the original article alluded to in this article, it's clear that the only way the couples' sex lives has "never been better" is because the girlfriend likes the way his junk looks better... because it looks bigger and therefor she wanted to fuck him more. That's it... aesthetics and size-queenery... her idea of what balls should look like. In a world where shrinkage doesn't exist. And it was a kind of weird tit-for-tat thing... because women are more likely to be doing a lot of cosmetic/plastic surgery type stuff, they feel like men should have to as well. And when their man is jumping thru these flaming hoops for them it makes them want them more.
It reminds me of a girl my best friend was dating once and getting serious about marrying. She didn't like his foreskin. Wouldn't touch his dick. And only allowed him to have sex with her in the dark, but absolutely no oral. BUT... if he got circumcised then she would go back to treating him like a human being again. And he was thinking about actually doing it!!! I was like... no, dude... dump this woman because she is crazy AF. Fortunately he did, and is married to a wonderful woman who loves his uncut dong.
Anyways... wow. I can't even imagine spending $1000 per treatment for my balls to hang lower. Her pussy game better be on fire to be worth that. LOL.