Tolerance

I like to think I'm a tolerant person, I'll accept anyone as a friend until they show any of their true colours i dislike, I speak as i find. I will never block a class of person just because one or two within that class has done me wrong. E.g. the Gay community, i get many FRs from gay men, me I'm straight and i make that clear, if that's a problem for them... don't FR me! But i have Gay friends who i chat to, they are great people.

The bit that "grinds my gears" so to speak, is those with the phrase "no single men" blazed on their profile like some badge of honour... now, listen, I know you've probably had a bad experience from some single men which has lead you to make that comment, but dismissing that you'd ever be able to be friends with one is barmy.

I abhor misandry like this... and I'll not hesitate to boot members from this group who display that attitude.

Tolerant Richie x

This topic was edited
RE:Tolerance

Well said Richie!!

Mike

This post was edited
RE:Tolerance

We all discriminate, one way or another. The reasons behind are interesting and some more legitimate (whatever this means) than others.

We discriminate against men in this very group. Ladies are welcome, couples are accepted without much requirements but normally (at least in the previous versions of this group) men are not accepted based on simply clicking on Add, they need to contact nicely a mod.

Now, "no men" doesn't necessarily mean that the person has had bad experience with men before but more likely it means two things: 1. I'm here for the girls and 2. I have sex on my mind. Which is not per se morally wrong, most men like to see naked girls and will sometimes have sex on their minds when this happens, who am I to judge, I exploit this all the time in my posts by teasing you.

So among people who say this you will have:
1. Girls who say so may just want to chat with other girls and not be submitted to pickup attempts. But chances are high that they are more interested in sex with other girls.
3. Guys who pretend to be girls for more access to their pics and chat;
3. Couples where the male is jealous or is (usually hopelessly) looking into a threesome;
4. Men posing as a couple because you know... The "no men" policy.
5. Men who are here for the girls.

Now, I did occasionally receive unpleasant messages but I am a tolerant gal, I know where they come from, I'm used to it and I just ignore them. Rather than having a "no men" policy I simply reject men's request unless they contact me first (and no, a Howdy won't do...). Yes, a bit like for ENL. Is that discrimination? Yes Sir. But we ladies do need to be more discriminate than you guys otherwise you know what would happen. As they say, I have the vagina, I make the rules.

And I've always wanted to launch a topic about empathy and tolerance but there would be so little sex in it that nobody would actually read it. So maybe I should launch one about our preference, circumcised Vs, uncircumcised... That would elicit lots of replies, unfortunately mostly of guys declaring what they are and not really discussing the ins and outs of the topic...

This post was edited
RE:Tolerance

We all discriminate, one way or another. The reasons behind are interesting and some more legitimate (whatever this means) than others.We discriminate against men in this very group. Ladies are welcome, couples are accepted without much requirements but normally (at least in the previous versions of this group) men are not accepted based on simply clicking on Add, they need to contact nicely a mod.Now, "no men" doesn't necessarily mean that the person has had bad experience with men before but more likely it means two things: 1. I'm here for the girls and 2. I have sex on my mind. Which is not per se morally wrong, most men like to see naked girls and will sometimes have sex on their minds when this happens, who am I to judge, I exploit this all the time in my posts by teasing you.So among people who say this you will have:1. Girls who say so may just want to chat with other girls and not be submitted to pickup attempts. But chances are high that they are more interested in sex with other girls.3. Guys who pretend to be girls for more access to their pics and chat;3. Couples where the male is jealous or is (usually hopelessly) looking into a threesome;4. Men posing as a couple because you know... The "no men" policy.5. Men who are here for the girls.Now, I did occasionally receive unpleasant messages but I am a tolerant gal, I know where they come from, I'm used to it and I just ignore them. Rather than having a "no men" policy I simply reject men's request unless they contact me first (and no, a Howdy won't do...). Yes, a bit like for ENL. Is that discrimination? Yes Sir. But we ladies do need to be more discriminate than you guys otherwise you know what would happen. As they say, I have the vagina, I make the rules.And I've always wanted to launch a topic about empathy and tolerance but there would be so little sex in it that nobody would actually read it. So maybe I should launch one about our preference, circumcised Vs, uncircumcised... That would elicit lots of replies, unfortunately mostly of guys declaring what they are and not really discussing the ins and outs of the topic...

You know the bit that shows these muppets for who they are.... they'll "friend" an uncertified 'woman' with stolen porn pics on her profile... this is most definitely a man posing as a woman... so let me get this right, you'd rather "friend" a dishonest weasel of a man pretending to be a woman than a man who is just a man... knock yourselves out.

I'll descend from my soap box now, gingerly stepping down.... Richie

This post was edited