Erection photos do not worry me - for some of us if we did not have an erection you would see nothing! What about a woman with erect nipples? People being hung up on sex - it is real - it happens - this is life!
It may be your life but it is not a nudist life and your need to see yourself and others should be on another site.
Seems to me the ones most hung-up on sex are not the nudists here.
"I agree, although the pervs are unlikely to understand it as I doubt they read the forums. "
lmao, right? Someone would actually have to care to read the rules in the first place, and that's what makes it so hard to find a decent, legitimate nudist site.
Seems to me the ones most hung-up on sex are not the nudists here.
Such seems to always be the case.
Kinda true, sex should be a non-issue, because it is just as natural as the human body and life itself. But, I know myself personaly, I don't come here to look at erect penises and wide open vaginas, I only want to make friends with people who enjoy the same comforts as I do. And in that sense the site should be as comfortable a place as an evening camp fire would be at my house. If someone wants to "do the deed", they can go off and find a secluded spot to do so. Granted if we were in person, erections may happen from time to time, but in a situation such as this, the individual user chooses the pictures they want to upload. So when you come across pictures such as those mentioned in this thread, you know that the user deliberatly uploaded that peticular photo to the site. This means that you now have a member who is blatently disobeying the rules, which tends to lead to problems for the rest of the law-abiding community.
Their stated policy is that this kind of content is NOT allowed. When I first joined a few years ago, I was getting friend requests from a lot of people with pure porn in their photos. When I reported it using true nudists' report feature, nothing ever happened. Weeks and months later the same pornographic photos would still be there. That's why I quit coming here for so long. Lately I figure to just be a steady presence promoting non-sexually oriented nudism to counter act stuff like that. I don't know if TN removes that stuff when it's reported now, but I know they didn't in the past.
There is a difference between a woman showing her 'pussy' and a man having an erection. An erection is a result of an arousal, while a 'pussy' shot is just a woman proud of her body -- which is ok!
WRONG. Just showing the external vagina is fine, just like showing a flaccid penis. However, when the interior lips are viewable, that is definitely not fine.
This is such a stupid thing to police, if it is someones private profile where the pics are only visible to their friends, what the **** does it matter, if you dont like them, dont look at them. I would never flag someone for having a sexually provocative photo, we are all adults, wish the holier than thou amoung you would just live and let live..
No, it is not someone's "private profile". When they put up a profile/picture etc. on TN, they have to follow the rules that the site administrator sets. The site administrator is only letting you use his site because he expects you to go along with his rules.
Oh, and since we are all adults, we should certainly know better than to swear...
It's apparent that self regulation doesn't work. Moderators are a needed part of any large forum. They are integral to the smooth running of a forum such as this. The rules are in place for a reason and if you don't agree with them you can choose not to participate in the forum or you could always start your own site and run it any way you see fit.
Also, why is it that as soon as erotic pictures are criticized, people throw out the "I shouldn't have to be ashamed and hide my body" crap. You can show your body, just do it tactfully and not in a sexual or pornographic way. I can see porn any time I want on the web, I come here for nudist related subjects, not to view sexual photos of you and yours.